1. This test will be held in class at the start of class on Thursday, 26 April, 2012. The test period will begin at 10:30 and end at 11:45 AM or whenever the last person present finishes. Do NOT be late! No late or make-tests will be scheduled. There will be no exceptions.
2. The blue book you provided will be returned to you with appropriate identification. You may use a pencil or blue or black pen to complete the test. No notes, books, handouts, dictionaries, electronic devices, or any other materials of any kind may be used.
3. Do not write your name anywhere on your test. Please also “double-space” your answers, and write only on the front of the pages. (Don’t worry—you will have plenty of space.)
4. Your test answers should be your own work. Any detectable collaboration will be considered cheating. So will absences from the test longer than five minutes. Cheating will not be tolerated. In keeping with Marygrove College’s academic honesty policy, sanctions up to and including automatic failure of the course may be applied in cases of cheating.
5. This is NOT a research assignment. You are NOT to use outside sources. Usage of verbatim quotations from the textbook and paraphrasing of the textbook are to be used sparingly and kept under three lines per occurrence. If you must use quotations, know that all verbatim quotations must be enclosed in quotation marks. All such quotations, and any paraphrasing of material from the text, must be followed by an appropriate citation. The following simplified format may be used: ([author’s name], [page number from which the text is taken]). The following is an example of the minimally acceptable citation format:
For a verbatim quotation: “Of all the things which wisdom acquires to produce the blessedness of the complete life, far the greatest is the possession of friendship.” (Cahn & Markie, p. 183)
For paraphrasing: Epictetus says that friendship is the most important thing for a blessed life. (Cahn & Markie p. 183)
Failure to cite quoted or paraphrased works properly is plagiarism—the misrepresentation of other’s work as one’s own. Plagiarism will not be tolerated. In keeping with Marygrove College’s academic honesty policy, the first instance of plagiarism will merit a grade of “0” on the test and the notification of the student’s advisor. Repeated offenses will be met with more serious sanctions. Lecture material does not need to be followed by a citation.
6. Be sure that you address all parts of the question. Be efficient, clear, and thorough in your writing. Keep in mind that this is a test of your understanding of the material, not a solicitation of a manifesto of your own personal philosophy. Stay focused on simply and directly answering the questions.
7. Your answers should be substantive and your points should be supported with evidence (from the text), lecture material and independent argument. All technical philosophical terms (e.g. ‘psychological continuity’, ‘substance’, etc.) should be defined. Charts, graphs, and drawings should not be used. Your answer must be correct and clear. It need not be rhetorically pleasing. That said, basic issues such as grammar, spelling, and structure will all count towards your grade. Clear writing and clear thinking go hand in hand.
8. If you have any questions feel free to e-mail me at any time. I do not give provisional grades to test answers but I will answer questions about the test insofar as I can without conferring an unfair advantage on anyone.
TEST QUESTIONS & FORMAT:
On the day of the exam the instructor will return your blue book to you with your student number on the outside cover. On the day of the test one of the questions below will be allotted to each student via a random procedure. This means that you have an equal chance of getting any one of the four questions below. The question assigned to you will truly be the luck of the draw. Not even the instructor will know which of the questions you will answer before the day of the test. You will be responsible for answering ONLY the question assigned to you. Do NOT answer the others. No extra credit of any kind will be given.
Below are the questions. These questions will not be altered in any way prior to the exam. They will occur exactly as they are written here. READ EACH QUESTION VERY CAREFULLY and break it into its composite parts before attempting to answer.
1. Arlene is reading Harman's essay "The Intrinsic Quality of Experience" and is doing the same set of study questions you did for pages 34-40. This is her answer to question 1:
The properties of a represented object are mental, because objects only are known mentally. The properties of a representation of an object are the same as the properties the object has. For example, if an animal has horns, then a picture of that animal has horns too.
Poor Arlene clearly has made several mistakes. In your answer, help her out by explaining exactly how she gets Harman wrong here.
2. Beth and Caroline are discussing the argumentation between philosophers of mind who hold positions like Nagel's and those who hold positions like Harman's. Beth is fond of Nagel's position, and offers Caroline the following argument:
(1) When one eats chocolate, one is aware of the perceptions, sensations, and feelings that come with eating chocolate—in other words, one is aware of the intrinsic quality of the experience of eating chocolate, the "what it's like" to eat choclate.
(2) Functionalists cannot explain this kind of "what it's like".
(3) Therefore functionalism isn't a good candidate for a theory of the mind.
Give and explain the reply to this argument that Caroline will give if she follows Harman's line of reasoning. (Hint: You may want to re-read pp. 40-43 of Harman's essay.)
3. Danielle has been a paramedic for ten years. Over the course of that time she has saved countless lives. Seeing so many people in trouble, however, has made her somewhat bitter and pessimistic about humanity's ability to survive in general. She comes to believe that her work is pointless because everyone she saves will eventually die anyway. Using Kekes' criteria, would we say that Danielle's life has worth? Would we say that it has meaning? In each case, why or why not?
4. Explain in detail Kekes' distinction between internal and external goods. Give an example of each. Into which category would the goalie's feeling of success from winning the Stanley Cup be classified? Explain why.